Thursday, January 31, 2008

Proposed House Bill HB 3415 Aims to Provide a Mechanism to Settle State and County Disagreement over who has Jurisdiction over a “Public Highway”

Under the State Highways Act, a public highway is either a state public highway or a county public highway.

Hawaii courts have determined that if a public highway is on the State Department of Transportation’s list of State highways, it is a state public highway. If not, it is a county public highway.

Despite the clarity of the law, the counties generally rebuff state determinations that a public highway is a county public highway. Some apply the term “roads in limbo” to describe public highways that counties refuse to recognize as county public highways under the Act. Unfortunately, this jargon has only served to confuse the issue.

Thankfully, it looks like the legislature has taken notice. HB 3415, will allow any person to file for a contested case hearing to determine jurisdiction over a public road with the department of commerce and consumer affairs. A hearings officer will be appointed and after hearing evidence, the officer will “decide whether a public road is a public highway, county highway, public trail or nonpublic right-of-way under section 264-1 and shall order any relief that may be appropriate.”

If passed, this bill will save many landowners who are left in the lurch when squabbles over ownership of public roads between the county and state ensue.

Postscript: Many have confused the State Highways Act by introducing the issue of private roads and tort liability into the equation. In short, if a road was originally private, it must be formally accepted by either the state or county before it is categorized as a "public highway."  See Wemple v. Dahman, 83 P. 3d 100 (2004).  Regarding tort liability,"the test for determining liability is degree of control rather than mere ownership."  See Id.

No comments: